Cloud Computing and the Consumer

April 28, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

.

Even if consumers don’t know what cloud computing is, they’re probably using it.

‘neb·u·lous’ – adjective – cloudy or cloudlike - Dictionary.com

‘Lick’ has a lot to answer for. In 1963 Joseph Carl Robnett Licklider, ‘Lick’ to his friends, wrote a memo to his colleagues entitled ‘Members and Affiliates of the Intergalactic Computer Network’. It began apologising for his postponement of a meeting, but by the end he had laid the groundwork for a term which still baffles consumers nearly 50 years later. Lick stressed the importance in computers developing “a capability for integrated network operation… such a network as I envisage nebulously”.

The phrase ‘Cloud Computing’ was born. It probably wasn’t the best description, Licklider admitted in the same memo “as you may have detected… I am at a loss for a name”, but the analogy stuck. Today Gartner predicts the Cloud Computing Market will be worth $150 billion by 2013 and that by 2014 60 per cent of server workloads will be spent processing Cloud data. It cannot be stopped and it should not be stopped. It already dominates consumers’ lives and, as one report observed, this year’s CES (the world’s largest consumer tech event) “should have been called the Cloud Electronics Show”.

Cloud computing istockphoto original Cloud Computing and the Consumer

What is Cloud Computing?

So what on earth is it? The simplest definition of Cloud Computing is the delivery of computing as a service rather than a product, where the service is provided over a network (typically the Internet). Pure Cloud Computing includes web email such as Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo email; social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter and ‘streaming’ Internet entertainment services like Spotify, Netflix and BBC iPlayer. A great deal of productivity software lives “in the Cloud” as well such as Google Docs and Microsoft’s Office 365. Modern file synchronisation and backup services are all ‘Cloud-based’ too including Apple iCloud, Dropbox and Microsoft SkyDrive.

It isn’t technically correct, but an easy rule of thumb is to substitute ‘Cloud’ for ‘Internet’. Yes it really isn’t all that difficult, but despite continual media hype, most consumers have no idea what Cloud Computing is or how it works. In August last year the NPD Group announced research which claimed just 22 per cent of consumers were familiar with the term, though 76 per cent of respondents reported using some type of Cloud-based service in the past 12 months.

“Whether they understand the terminology or not, consumers are actually pretty savvy in their use of cloud-based applications,” concluded Stephen Baker, vice president of industry analysis for NPD. “They might not always recognize they are performing activities in the cloud, yet they still rely on and use those services extensively.”

Little else matters. Henry Ford didn’t care whether customers understood the inline four-cylinder monobloc flathead engine inside the Model T and he didn’t require them to define precisely what an automobile was. Ford just wanted consumers to buy it and by doing so in their droves they created a new sector that took society to the next level. Cloud Computing is no different and the benefits to its widespread adoption are arguably even greater.

This is no tongue in cheek statement…

This is a sample. Read the full article on ITProPortal

.

ask Cloud Computing and the Consumer delicious Cloud Computing and the Consumer digg Cloud Computing and the Consumer facebook Cloud Computing and the Consumer google Cloud Computing and the Consumer linkedin Cloud Computing and the Consumer myspace Cloud Computing and the Consumer reddit Cloud Computing and the Consumer slashdot Cloud Computing and the Consumer stumbleupon Cloud Computing and the Consumer technorati Cloud Computing and the Consumer twitter Cloud Computing and the Consumer windowslive Cloud Computing and the Consumer yahoo Cloud Computing and the Consumer email Cloud Computing and the Consumer

The Dropbox Effect

April 24, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

.
We all love Dropbox, but how did it become the default cloud-based storage solution?
.
The Dropbox Effect
“Tom Cruise in Minority Report is not carrying around a thumb drive”
Dropbox co-founder, Drew Houston
.
Numerous reports, papers and presentations have been given in recent years to explain the rise of Dropbox, the file backup and synchronisation service which has taken the world by storm. In reality the reason for its success is simple: it realised the easiest way to access your data was not by carrying it, but by having it delivered.

Dropbox Founders original The Dropbox Effect

For those not in the know, Dropbox is a file hosting, backup and synchronisation service. It works by giving users a single folder which automatically synchronises content added or deleted across multiple devices as well as backing up online. Edited or removed files are kept for up to 30 days online and ‘sharing’ folders can be setup between friends, family or colleagues. Dropbox offers users 2GB of storage space for free, premium subscriptions provide 50GB, 100GB or ‘Team’ accounts for companies.

Dropbox wasn’t the first company to stumble upon this formula, but it has been the breakout success story. We look at why.

The Landscape before Dropbox

Houston is right, there may not have been thumb drives in Minority Report, but when the Science Fiction film was released in 2002, the real world was overrun by them. IBM and Trek Technology were first to market in 1999 with 8MB devices and as capacity increased and size reduced the tech savvy would even boast about whose thumb drive was the best. The technology was impressive, but blinding. Users lost sight of the fact they were mere extensions of the floppy disk and actually a backwards step from the lightening fast Intranets of their schools and universities.

“I graduate and for me it’s back to the Stone Age,” argues Houston. “Where I am emailing myself stuff I’m carrying on a thumb drive. A couple of times I must have put it in the wash… and prayed I hadn’t destroyed it. But I felt like I was just always one stupid move away from disaster.”

This is a sample. Continuing reading the full article on ITProPortal

ask The Dropbox Effect delicious The Dropbox Effect digg The Dropbox Effect facebook The Dropbox Effect google The Dropbox Effect linkedin The Dropbox Effect myspace The Dropbox Effect reddit The Dropbox Effect slashdot The Dropbox Effect stumbleupon The Dropbox Effect technorati The Dropbox Effect twitter The Dropbox Effect windowslive The Dropbox Effect yahoo The Dropbox Effect email The Dropbox Effect

[The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism

April 12, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

A rare deviation. This article is not written by me, rather I am a part of it giving career advice to aspiring journalists for an article in the Guardian.

My Big Break in Journalism: Writers Reveal their Routes into the Media

What does it take to get a journalism career started? A handful of high profile reporters tell Jack Oughton how they got their foot in the door, and offer advice for budding journalists

Keen to find out what the journalists and writers that I look up to did to get to where they are today, I devised a mini career questionnaire and sent a few tweets and emails to get some answers. I asked: what’s the one piece of advice you’d give to aspiring journalists? What was the most important thing you did for your career? And, what is good journalism to you? Here are some highlights from what they had to say.

[Cut to my section. I don't have rights to republish in its entirety.]

Gordon Kelly is a writer and journalist specialising in technology, music and film. He works freelance as a features writer for TrustedReviews, the BBC and Wired, produces internal magazines for a number of major companies and teaches courses in media relations

“Remember the 5 Ws [who, what, where, when, why]. It is basic, but how you order information is fundamental to better writing. If I’m allowed a second: don’t be afraid to say you don’t understand. Journalists spend their time talking to specialists. Better to ask a question at the time than feel foolish in print later on.

At my first job my editor made me write nothing but NIBs (news in brief) for the first week. NIBs could be no shorter than 23 words and no longer than 27 words. The lesson was crucial: quickly identify what is and isn’t important and work out what is the heart of the story. Now being able to see the hook of a story, feature or editorial is arguably my biggest strength. To this day if I’m struggling with something I try to summarise it in 23 to 27 words.

[Good journalism is] stories that engage. Different industries and different titles will have a huge influence on what and how you can write, but from these boundaries I think it is important to convey to the reader: ‘this is why you should care’. From cats stuck in trees to front page news, if you don’t care about what you write, why should anyone else?”

Read the entire article here with further advice from the likes of Guardian Technology Editor Charles Arthur, renowned freelance journalist Elizabeth Pears, BGR executive editor Zach EpsteinTom Warren - Senior News Editor at The Verge and founder of WinRumors, Guardian Money editor Hilary Osborne and Dan Raywood, online news editor for SC Magazine.

 

ask [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism delicious [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism digg [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism facebook [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism google [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism linkedin [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism myspace [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism reddit [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism slashdot [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism stumbleupon [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism technorati [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism twitter [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism windowslive [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism yahoo [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism email [The Guardian] My Big Break in Journalism

Looking Through Google Project Glass

April 11, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

Google has given us a glimpse of the future with Project Glass. How realistic is it?

“I need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle.”
the Terminator

There is fundamental interest in being able to see more than the naked eye can perceive. The analytics of the Terminator, witnessing the magnetic spectrum like Geordi La Forge, Cyclops’s ability to fire laser beams – enhancing vision takes us straight to science fiction and a world of almost infinite possibility. A world that Google this week let us dream may not be that far away…

.

Project Glass
Had it come from any smaller company, ‘Project Glass‘ would be dismissed as a pipe dream, the ambitious vision of a design student trying to attract the attention of a high profile employer. However, it comes from Google’s labs, and the company is deadly serious. “We think technology should work for you—to be there when you need it and get out of your way when you don’t,” it proclaimed. “A group of us from Google [x] started Project Glass to build this kind of technology, one that helps you explore and share your world, putting you back in the moment.”

A promotional video (above) accompanied the announcement demonstrating how core smartphone functionality (mapping, social media, video calls, etc) could be integrated into a pair of lightweight glasses using virtual reality. Google showed off a concept design and then, as if to demonstrate the strength of its conviction, a few days later company co-founder Sergey Brin casually turned up to a public charity event wearing a pair (below). A timescale appeared (late 2013) and even a price range was mooted (£300-£500).
94 000022d90 c095 google project glass hires 580x386 Looking Through Google Project Glass
What Nonsense
There is a logical reaction to all of this: “what nonsense!” The Project Glass video has already been subject to numerous parodies and it raises more questions, both in terms of hardware and software, than it answers. Looking at the hardware you have to question battery life in an age where we can barely get a smartphone to see out a day. In addition there are questions of durability, heat, fit (especially for those who already wear glasses), processing power, always-on internet connectivity and much more. Just wait for the campaigns to begin about them cooking your brain.

This is a sample. Continue reading the rest of the article on TrustedReviews

.

ask Looking Through Google Project Glass delicious Looking Through Google Project Glass digg Looking Through Google Project Glass facebook Looking Through Google Project Glass google Looking Through Google Project Glass linkedin Looking Through Google Project Glass myspace Looking Through Google Project Glass reddit Looking Through Google Project Glass slashdot Looking Through Google Project Glass stumbleupon Looking Through Google Project Glass technorati Looking Through Google Project Glass twitter Looking Through Google Project Glass windowslive Looking Through Google Project Glass yahoo Looking Through Google Project Glass email Looking Through Google Project Glass

[BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

April 3, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

My debut feature for new BBC Worldwide site BBC Future.

Note: as part of BBC Worldwide, BBC Future is not available to available UK dwellers. You can use this ‘anonymouse’ link to view it.

The official link can be found here:
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120402-the-myth-of-the-unsinkable-ship

The full article can also be read below, click to enlarge each page. 

Titanic Anniversary The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship p1 [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

Page 1

Titanic Anniversary The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship p2 [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

Page 2

Titanic Anniversary The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship p3 [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

Page 3

Titanic Anniversary The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship p4 [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

Page 4

ask [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship delicious [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship digg [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship facebook [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship google [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship linkedin [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship myspace [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship reddit [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship slashdot [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship stumbleupon [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship technorati [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship twitter [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship windowslive [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship yahoo [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship email [BBC Future] Titanic Anniversary: The Myth of the Unsinkable Ship

The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media

April 3, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

In the run up to Digital Scotland last month I produced two features for The Scotsman newspaper: ‘Myths and Miracles of Social Media’ and a ‘Smart Devices: Roundup’.

Many thanks to all the contributors involved in this.

Please find an image of the articles from the newspaper below and a PDF can be downloaded here. Questions, comments and further professional enquiries welcome.

Digital Scotland The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media

Click to Enlarge

 

ask The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media delicious The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media digg The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media facebook The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media google The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media linkedin The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media myspace The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media reddit The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media slashdot The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media stumbleupon The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media technorati The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media twitter The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media windowslive The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media yahoo The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media email The Scotsman: Myths & Miracles of Social Media

The Paperless Office: Why it never happened

March 6, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

We’ve been talking about the paperless office for decades, so why is it still just a dream?

The Paperless Office: Why it never happened

Written by Gordon Kelly (for ITProPortal)

In 2012 the global demand for paper is expected to exceed 400 million tons for the first time. Before recycling this equates to 7.2 billion trees, after recycling it still tops four billion trees and eliminates an area the size of Croatia. Remarkably this landmark will be set against a background of flourishing digital media, economic downturn and increasing pressure to live in an environmentally friendly manner. It is a damning situation: try as we might, we just can’t break our addiction to paper.

1 The Paperless Office: Why it never happened

Nearly 40 years ago this scenario was seemingly unimaginable. Speaking in Business Week in 1975 Vincent E. Giuliano of Arthur D. Little Inc, the world’s oldest management consultancy firm, predicted the use of paper would rapidly decline by 1980 “and by 1990, most record-handling will be electronic.” His comments came in an article entitled ‘The Office of the Future‘ under a subsection called ‘The Paperless Office’. It is thought to be the first time this ominous phrase was used.

A Changing Vision

The notion of ditching paper spread like wildfire and pouring petrol onto the flames was technology. The idea wasn’t new. As far back as 1945 American engineer Vannevar Bush theorised about the memex machine (a portmanteau of ‘memory’ and ‘index’), which individuals would use to store their books, records and communications. It would provide an “enlarged intimate supplement to one’s memory… a sort of mechanized private file and library. It would use microfilm storage, dry photography, and analog [sic] computing to give post war scholars access to a huge, indexed repository of knowledge-any section of which could be called up with a few keystrokes.”

Bush famously went much further in his essay ‘As We May Think‘, predicting the concept of the Internet, search and even Wikipedia. Continue reading

ask The Paperless Office: Why it never happened delicious The Paperless Office: Why it never happened digg The Paperless Office: Why it never happened facebook The Paperless Office: Why it never happened google The Paperless Office: Why it never happened linkedin The Paperless Office: Why it never happened myspace The Paperless Office: Why it never happened reddit The Paperless Office: Why it never happened slashdot The Paperless Office: Why it never happened stumbleupon The Paperless Office: Why it never happened technorati The Paperless Office: Why it never happened twitter The Paperless Office: Why it never happened windowslive The Paperless Office: Why it never happened yahoo The Paperless Office: Why it never happened email The Paperless Office: Why it never happened

Is Apple TV Apple’s Most Important Product?

February 25, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

Strange but true: 3rd generation iPad and Apple TVs will be announced next month. You should be more excited about the latter…

Is Apple TV Apple’s Most Important Product?

94%7C00002251a%7C515c orh300w300 94 0000215ee f164 orh616w616 apple tv Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product?

There is a lot of excitement about 7 March, but it is focused on the wrong product. While the headlines speculate upon the possibility of Tim Cook unveiling a fatter iPad 3 or even iPad 2S, an arguably far more important product is also tipped to take to the stage: a new Apple TV.

In purely financial terms this sounds like a ludicrous statement. In January Apple reported huge financial results which revealed sales of 15.43 million iPads in just 14 weeks up to 31 December. It represented a growth of 111 per cent over the same period in 2010 and nearly tripled the 5.2m Macs sold over the same period. A post PC era indeed. Furthermore iPhone sales were reported at 37.04m, an even bigger 128 per cent leap year on year. To quote Tim Cook: “We’re thrilled with our outstanding results and record-breaking sales of iPhones, iPads and Macs”. What of the Apple TV? It wasn’t even mentioned.

224561 in an e mail to a customer apple ceo tim cook assured that the company Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product?
Except this isn’t entirely true. Cook was quizzed about the omission of Apple TV figures by Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster in follow up financial call. “The Apple TV product is doing actually very well,” Cook admitted. “In the last fiscal year that ended in September we sold a bit above 2.8 million units, and just in the past quarter we set a new quarterly record for Apple TV at over 1.4 million.” That said, “in the scheme of things, if you [check] the revenues, we still classify this as a hobby” he added. Again financially speaking Cook is right, 1.4m $99 Apple TVs (admittedly £99 in the UK) would generate just $140m compared to the $2.5bn for the iPad, $6.6bn for the Mac and $9bn for the iPhone.
.
Interestingly, given Apple’s famous marketing rhetoric, Cook continued to play down the Apple TV. “I think it’s a fantastic product,” he said “and we continue to pull the strings to see where it takes us” but then the guard slipped: “if you’re using the latest one… I don’t know about you, but I couldn’t live without it.” Taken as a whole this paints an unusually convoluted picture for a company so polished in its presentation: 50 per cent of all sales in the last three months, hobby, see where it takes us, I couldn’t live without it. Anyone might think Apple is trying to hide something? Continue reading

 

ask Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? delicious Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? digg Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? facebook Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? google Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? linkedin Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? myspace Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? reddit Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? slashdot Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? stumbleupon Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? technorati Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? twitter Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? windowslive Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? yahoo Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product? email Is Apple TV Apples Most Important Product?

Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM

February 17, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

Why Microsoft’s plans for Windows on ARM risk going horribly wrong.

Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM

94 0000222a7 81d7 orh300w300 arm on windows Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM

It is said disappointment comes wrapped in lengthy explanation and it doesn’t get much lengthier than the 8 627 words it took Windows Division president Steven Sinofsky to finally detail ‘Windows 8 on ARM’. ‘WOA’ may sound like a line from Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, but we were far from wowed – in fact we can summarise Sinofsky’s 8,627 words in just two: cheap imitation.

Here is what we learned:

1. WOA will have a desktop, albeit one that only runs Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote) and opens Explorer.
2. WOA will not support virtualisation so no existing x86/x64 programs will ever run on it
3. WOA programmes must be Metro-style apps, only available through the Windows Store
4. WOA’s version of Internet Explorer will not support Flash
5. WOA will be launched at roughly the same time as the x86/x64 version of Windows 8 (Q4 2012), but will not match the latter’s 29 February public beta.

In short: it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but isn’t really a duck. And for the masses who struggle to tell you what version of Windows they currently run, it is a recipe for disaster. Sceptical? Jump forward 12 months and try explaining points 1-4 to any relative when they ask you what to buy. Worse still run through the conversation you’ll have with friends and relatives who have already bought a WOA device and want to know how they go about installing their favourite programs. The Chinese are famous for producing underwhelming knock-offs of long established, trusted brands… it is rarely done by the brand owner itself.

What Microsoft has done with WOA is break the golden rule: don’t mislead those easily mislead – there is a reason children can walk you through Apple’s product range. As it stands WOA is an important technical achievement for Microsoft’s engineers, but with Intel Medfield architecture hitting devices shortly will there be any real motivation to opt for the watered down Windows? Whatever is saved on price is lost many times over by the fact you will have to buy Metro-equivalents of your existing software all over again. It also sends out the wrong message: Windows using ARM chips cannot be as good, as fully featured as Windows on x86/x64 chips.
Ultimately WOA is the result of misdirection. Continue reading
ask Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM delicious Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM digg Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM facebook Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM google Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM linkedin Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM myspace Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM reddit Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM slashdot Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM stumbleupon Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM technorati Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM twitter Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM windowslive Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM yahoo Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM email Cheap Imitation: The Risk of Windows on ARM

Private Property: What Google’s Unified Privacy Policy Means for You

February 15, 2012 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

 

I enjoy the opportunity to get my teeth into topics in some depth so if you’re wondering what Google’s new privacy policy will mean to its users, read this!

Gordon Kelly  avatar thumbnail Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You

Written by
Gordon Kelly (for IT Pro Portal)

“We’ve been tidying up a little, making our privacy policies and terms more consistent, easier to read and easier to understand. You see while privacy policies, ours included, may not be the most popular read on the Internet, we think they’re important. So instead of over 60 policies for different Google products and features we’re introducing just one with fewer words, simpler explanations and less legal gloop to wade through.”

-Google Privacy Policy Update promotional video (24.01.2012)

600111 Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You

One Policy to Rule them all

From 1 March Google is radically overhauling its privacy policies. In broad terms Google’s numerous (70, not 60) policies will be replaced with just one. Consequently instead of a policy for Gmail, one for Google Calendar, one for YouTube, another for Search and so on they will be amalgamated and no longer tied to services, but accounts. Crucially Google will then share the information you provide across all these services, though not with third parties. Again the pitch is compelling:

“Over time it’ll mean better search results and ads, we’ll understand that when you search for Jaguar you’re looking for a jaguar [animal] and not a Jaguar [car],” claims Google. “It can mean more accurate spelling suggestions because you’ve tagged a word before and it may even mean we’ll be able to tell you when you’ll be late for a meeting based on your location, your calendar and local traffic conditions. All of which means we’re not just keeping your private stuff private, we’re making it more useful to you in your daily life too.”

60011 1 Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You

These benefits are tangible. If you discuss your interest in something in an email YouTube may suggest videos about it and search results will be automatically refined to improve their effectiveness. For Google Apps (professional Google accounts) the situation is slightly different: core Apps services (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sites, Control Panel) have their own contract which takes precedence over the new privacy terms so they will be unaffected. Access non-core services (YouTube, Picasa, Blogger, etc) with your Google Apps account however and information will be shared between them.

Why you should be worried

Four key reasons: stubbornness, convergence, exposure and track record.

Stubbornness - Google is not budging over the implementation of its unified privacy policy, despite pressure from both the European Union and US Congress. Continue reading

 

ask Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You delicious Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You digg Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You facebook Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You google Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You linkedin Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You myspace Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You reddit Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You slashdot Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You stumbleupon Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You technorati Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You twitter Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You windowslive Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You yahoo Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You email Private Property: What Googles Unified Privacy Policy Means for You

Next Page »

© 2009-2012 GordonKelly.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33