iPhone 4

It wasn’t called the iPhone HD or the iPhone 4G, but that was about the only information the leaks had wrong. Thankfully there are many new and exciting elements to the new ‘iPhone 4′, but that is not what ‘Just the Bad Points’ is for. For that you’ll find many gushing websites all over the Web and you can read my extended opinions right here.

Instead JtBP is all about showing you what is wrong, contention, or downright bubble headed about products. The reasons you might not want to spend your hard earned cash on them. So before you commit to lengthy reviews here’s what you should be wary of with the new iPhone 4:

Just the Bad Points Review: Apple iPad

iphone4 iPhone 4

iPhone 4

  • Screen size still 3.5in despite rivals pushing to 3.7in and 4in
  • Same ageing facia remains
  • Move to micro SIM means regular SIM cards won’t fit
  • Improved camera uses only LED flash not the superior Xenon Flash
  • No 64GB version as widely expected (16GB/32GB only)
  • Still no microSD slot or HDMI/DisplayPort
  • Despite being thinner than the 3GS the iPhone 4 is slightly heavier
  • Battery still cannot be removed in new design
  • Bigger battery doesn’t extend standby time or video playback time
  • Same limited codec support
  • Photos still cannot be attached to existing emails
  • Still no Adobe Flash support (and there likely never will be)
  • Remains only available in black or white
  • Faux multitasking whereby most apps are paused in the background (streaming audio aside) rather than allowed to run simultaneously
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Windows Phone 7 Series

The writing seemed to be on the wall for Windows Mobile. Ugly, unloved and hopelessly out of date compared to its more intuitive models, not many expected much from its successor. Microsoft surprised us all with Windows Phone 7 Series, a verbosely titled reboot of the entire series. Early praise flooded in, but since its unveiling at Mobile World Congress in January a number of worrying cracks in its glossy veneer are starting to appear. So here they are, exposed for you all.

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: THE RULES

Just the Bad Points Review: Windows Phone 7 Series

  • No multi-tasking at launch (Microsoft confirms it could be added in future)
  • No expandable storage (Microsoft hardware guidelines forbid it)
  • No copy and paste at launch (yes, really!)
  • No Adobe Flash support at launch
  • No backwards compatibility with Windows Mobile (potentially a good point, long term)
  • Microsoft’s high minimum specifications for Series 7 handsets suggest there won’t be many affordable options from day one or design variants
  • Windows Marketplace (app store) begins from scratch thanks to incompatibilities
  • All 7 Series smartphones are likely to be large thanks to Microsoft’s high screen resolution minimum requirements
  • No proof Internet Explorer mobile edition can yet compete with Opera Mobile, Mobile Safari or even Mobile Firefox
  • Currently no Mac support to sync Series 7 handsets (unsurprising really)
  • Q4 release date still a long way off – where will the competition be? (A multi-tasking iPhone?)
  • Bing search, Bing Maps and Bing Video verses Google search, Google Maps and YouTube?
  • Unlike Android/iPhone firmware, the upgrade path for 7 Series uncertain. Free 8 Series upgrades? Don’t bet on it
  • Music and video syncing through Windows Media Player is a love it/hate it affair
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Apple iPad

iPhone or iPad? It is a close call which is the most hyped product of all time and you can read my full analysis here. That’s not what Just the Bad Points is about, however, so – in a nutshell – here are the main potential deal breakers in Apple’s new toy…

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: THE RULES

Just the Bad Points Review: Apple iPad

iPad large Apple iPad
Apple iPad – the backlash starts here?
  • No multi-tasking (just typical iPod/email and push notifications)
  • 1024 x 768 pixel display isn’t widescreen video friendly
  • No integrated camera [so no augmented reality!]
  • No GPS in the WiFi only model!
  • Network unlocked, but most networks don’t use the micro SIM format
  • The usual limited codec support (AAC, MP3, H.264)
  • Mono audio speakers
  • Still no Adobe Flash support
  • No USB ports
  • Non-expandable memory
  • Non-removable battery
  • No Ethernet Port
  • No HDMI/Displayport
  • No card reader
  • No breakdown of ‘up to’ 10 hours battery life
  • Prolonged typing on glass?
  • No mains power cable included
  • Hardware keyboard dock is kinda handy, but it only holds the iPad in portrait mode
  • 242.8 x 189.7 x 13.4mm and 730g (WiFi and 3G) not a huge advantage over 900g/1Kg smartbooks and netbooks given compromises
  • $499 starter price is tempting, but $629 (32GB & 3G) is the more realistic minimum, then case, dock and USB/SD card adaptors on top are likely to make this more expensive than any netbook, smartbook or even Intel CULV laptops.

Yep, that’s a big long list for what ultimately turned out to be more of an enlarged iPod touch than enlarged iPhone. Will I be biting? No. I simply can’t see any advantage over ARM’s Linux-based smartbooks, Windows 7-based netbooks, 11.6in CULV laptops or even the iPhone and iPod touch themselves…

[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Palm Pre (updated)

Given the devices’ UK launch today I’ve republished and updated this JtBP review for your perusal…

For once the hottest smartphone on the planet isn’t made by Apple. Even more incredibly it’s made by Palm, the comeback kid so far of 2009.  On TrustedReviews I have already guided you through the wonderful plus points of this handset but could there be any good reasons not to be buy it?

Read the Rules if you aren’t familiar with my already seemingly cult and contentious reviews’ system. In short, with JtBP I save the gushing praise for every other review you’ll read and bring you the bullet points on any potential deal breakers with something before you commit to the long winded waffle on your favourite sites/publications. It’s a time saver.

After I managed to grab more than an hour with this stunner here’s the JtBP review:


Palm Pre in the wild

Palm Pre in the wild


Just the Bad Points Review: Palm Pre

  • It may be superbly innovative but at 138g the Palm Pre isn’t light
  • The 3MP camera has above average image processing, but it hardly competes with dedicated camera phones
  • The Palm Pre ‘App Catalog’ has made a slow start to life with very few apps and teething problems launching paid apps.
  • The Pre is not compatible with previous Palm third party apps
  • Lacking business support (office document compatibility, editing, etc) though Microsoft Exchange is there
  • Battery life is poor with heavy use requiring two charges per day
  • Build quality isn’t great with a cheap plastic finish and wobbling sliding mechanism
  • The keyboard is neat, but the keys too compact if you have large fingers.
  • No microSD/SDHC slot limiting you to 8GB of onboard memory. Why oh why?
  • Video recording functionality is not ready in time for launch
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Antichrist

Tagline: When nature turns evil, true terror awaits

Plot: A grieving couple retreats to their cabin in the woods, hoping to repair their broken hearts and troubled marriage. But nature takes its course and things go from bad to worse

In short: There’s a powerful movie in there, but you’ll need a strong constitution to make it through

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in an offering before you commit to buy or read lengthy reviews on your favourites sites/magazines. For a more detailed description please read: THE RULES

Antichrist

Antichrist

Just the Bad Points Review: Antichrist

  • Explicit sex scenes (depending on your perspective)
  • Extreme violence and self mutilation
  • Scenes of (faked) animal suffering
  • Intense emotional confrontation
  • Child loss
  • Focus on the nature of depression & relationship collapse
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Moon

Tagline: The last place you’d ever expect to find yourself

Plot: Astronaut Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) is about to finish a three year stint on the Moon. He works alone supervising the robotic extraction of helium-3 from lunar soil, a compound which has single handily solved the Earth’s energy problems. He only companion is GERTY, his computer, but as the days tick down Sam makes a life changing discovery.

In short: The best film I have seen so far this year

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in an offering before you commit to buy or read lengthy reviews on your favourites sites/magazines. For a more detailed description please read: THE RULES

moon sam rockwell movie poster Moon

Moon - Starring: Sam Rockwell; Director: Duncan Jones

 

Just the Bad Points Review: Moon

  • Fans of action flicks will find this heavy going
  • This isn’t about aliens, gun fights or spaceships
  • As it sounds: one man, alone in space, on the moon
  • Not light entertainment
  • An emotional roller coaster ride
  • Don’t see it and you’ll miss out on the best movie of the year so far
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Samsung i8910 HD

Yes, it’s easily Samsung’s best attempt at an iPhone killer to date. The i8910 HD is featured packed with a 3.7in 16:9 AMOLED 360 x 640 capacitive touchscreen, eight megapixel camera with autofocus, LED flash, Face Detection, Smile Shot, Blink Shot and Panorama Shot. HD 720p video recording, HSUPA, WiFi, aGPS, Bluetooth 2.0 with A2DP, 8GB of native flash memory, a 32GB compatible microSD card slot, an FM tuner, digital compass, accelerometer, proximity sensor and light sensor.

There’s DivX /Xvid, H.264, WMV, Mpeg4 and Real video playback, MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC, WMA and Real Audio playback, dual stereo speakers with DNSe 2.0 and a Symbian S60 5.0 backbone with Document Viewer, E-Dictionary, Biz Card Recognition, Podcasting, 3D Games, app downloads, Push Email (MS Exchange) and Smart Search. Finally we find a whopping 1500 mAh battery. So really what’s NOT to like? I’ll tell you…

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: THE RULES

Samsung i8910 HD

Samsung i8910 HD also known as the Omnia HD

Just the Bad Points Review: Samsung i8910 HD

  • It’s BIG. Dimensions of 123 x 58 x 12.9mm give it the largest touchscreen handset footprint to date
  • It’s heavy. 144g it roughly 10% more than an iPhone, which itself is normally the limit people are happy with
  • There’s no multi-touch. Despite the introduction of a capacitive screen (which is what the iPhone has) Samsung still hasn’t done it
  • No App Store. Samsung (Jet aside) uses third party platforms and hasn’t got together its own third party applications store
  • The UI still isn’t as smooth or finger friendly as Palm’s WebOS, Google Android or, yes, iPhone OS
  • It’s expensive on contract. Not iPhone 3gS expensive of course, but certainly it reflects its flagship status
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Apple iPhone 3GS

Here we go again. The Apple ‘iPhone 3GS’ is now on sale and it is already shaping up to be even more controversial than both its predecessors. On the hardware side it brings a slightly improved camera (3 megapixels with autofocus, compared to 2MP fixed focus), video recording, marginally better battery life and up to 3x faster performance. It sounds good, but more importantly what’s NOT to like…?

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: the Rules

Just the Bad Points Review: Apple iPhone 3GS:

Apple iPhone 3G S (yes, there's a space)
Apple iPhone 3GS (the original space between ’3G’ and ‘S’ has now been removed – go figure!)
  • Evolution not revolution. This is the old model tweaked, not an overhaul
  • iPhone OS 3.0 brings most of the software benefits to iPhone 3G owners that the 3G S offers. Find a full features list here
  • Price. The iPhone 3G S is far more expensive than the iPhone 3G was at launch. Check with local telco before setting your heart on it
  • Push Notifications bring third party app alerts but do not represent full multitasking. When a programme closes it closes completely
  • Addition of turn by turn GPS still requires the purchase of third party software such as from flagship partner TomTom, which is extra expense
  • Low light camera performance is worse than the iPhone 3G (big problem if you want to take photos on nights out)
  • Screen not improved at all. Same resolution (320 x 480 pixels), jump not made to OLED
  • Searching emails across the server only checks the recipient and subject line details, not the body text
  • Looks just like the old iPhone 3G. There’s not even an ‘S’ on the back

Flaws still present from before:

  • A new model should be announced by June judging by Apple’s past track record
  • Camera lacks a flash
  • 16GB & 32GB options capacities available but no SDHC/microSDHC expansion slot to add to it
  • No second camera for video calling
  • iTunes tie: media content locked to specific computer, no simple drag & drop way to add files
  • Limited codec support excludes likes of Ogg Vorbis audio and – crucially – AVI video so lengthy format conversion required with third party software
  • Non-removeable battery so it can’t be swapped out on long journeys & requires expensive procedure to replace at an Apple store should it degrade outside the warranty
  • No Flash support in the mobile Safari web browser
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Wolfram Alpha

Wolfram Alpha, WolframAlpha, Wolfram|Alpha – however you want to say it – has the Internet very excited. It chooses to avoid the term ‘search engine’ in favour of “computational knowledge engine” and works very differently from Google by providing actual answers to questions rather than links to potential answers. Questions can be as simple as How tall in the Eiffel Tower? to real time mathematical calculation of satellite positions across the sky. If this sounds impressive, that’s because it is and while I’ve written an extensive and enthusiastic piece about Wolfram Alpha on TrustedReviews the fact is it isn’t perfect. So what are the bad points?

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: the Rules

image2 Wolfram Alpha

Just the Bad Points Review: Wolfram Alpha

  • It takes time and practice to learn the correct terminology to get good results from Wolfram Alpha
  • Natural language interpretation is poor, more than 25% of queries trigger the response: “Wolfram|Alpha isn’t sure what to do with your input”
  • It potentially damages traffic to traditional websites which spend time answering queries in greater detail
  • Topics such as mathematics, science, medicine and currency help academics but real world public usefulness is much lower at present
  • Many answers have little context
  • Answers take longer to load than the results from traditional search engines
  • Answers can be very dry. A search for Shakespeare, for example, could do with more than just his date/place of birth and a rather cold ‘timeline’
  • We know little of the financial security behind the project other than “Infrastructure for this computation provided by Wolfram|Alpha launch partner Dell, Inc”
  • Google is working on something similar with its Google Squared search project and its huge resources may outgun Wolfram Alpha

wolfram 470x1023 Wolfram Alpha

[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

HTC Magic Android Smartphone

The T-Mobile G1 has been left on its own as the sole Google Android handset for seven long months, but now it finally has some company and competition in form of the ‘Magic’. Like the G1, the Magic is made by Taiwanese manufacturing giant HTC but has been sold to different networks around the globe. On the surface, the HTC Magic is a far more sophisticated handset than the G1 and is an easy sell, so most importantly what’s not to like…

The preamble: My cult and contentious reviews’ system. Designed as a time saver to highlight the potential deal breakers in a product before you commit to reading lengthy reviews on your favourites sites and/or magazines. For a more detailed description please read: the Rules

HTC Magic Android Smartphone

HTC Magic Android Smartphone

Just the Bad Points Review: HTC Magic Android Smartphone

  • 3.2in capacitive touchscreen is large, but physically smaller than the HTC Touch HD & iPhone
  • The screen’s 320 x 480 resolution matches the iPhone but is less than some VGA (480 x 640) Windows Mobile smartphones
  • No physical Qwerty keyboard or number pad
  • 3.2 megapixel camera is mediocre and lacks autofocus
  • Native storage is minimal at 512MB though there is a microSD expansion slot
  • No multi-touch support exists in Android at present
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack means an adaptor must be used for third party earphones
  • No DivX/AVI video support
  • No support for lossless music
  • Android requires users to have a Gmail account (though enforced, in itself not a bad thing)
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [MySpace] [Reddit] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Next Page »

© 2009-2010 GordonKelly.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright