celebrex side effects in elderly

The iPhone Camera is Better Than You Think

March 1, 2009 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

There are many things the iPhone does well although for those interested I’ve also reviewed Just the Bad Points. Traditionally the iPhone’s infamously basic camera would feature in the latter category lacking a high resolution, autofocus, flash, zoom, image stabilisation but (and this is a big but) it isn’t nearly as bad as it is made out to be.

The reasons for this are a reasonably quick shutter action, decent low light performance and good colour reproduction. There is also a trick to getting half decent pictures with the iPhone camera: the photo is only taken when your finger is removed from the camera icon so you can prep shots much as you would with a standard compact or DSLR.

Now the iPhone camera is never going to be in the same league as dedicated cameraphones but just look what can be done with a little effort…

No Macro Mode but It's Not the End of the World

No Macro Mode but It Isn't the End of the World


01-03-2009-17-26-14

Even Action Shots Aren't Impossible

[nggallery id=2]

They’re not anywhere up to the standard of these samples, but here are some of my own efforts in recent times – most of which were taking during difficult lighting conditions.

[nggallery id=3]

Great credit to Photocritic for putting together an exhaustive gallery illustrating many brilliant examples of top notch iPhone photography. If you’re hungry for more then check out the full array from the link below.

Link: Photocritic – 100 Amazing iPhone Photos

Apple iPhone 3G

February 14, 2009 by  
Filed under Reviews

A (relative) oldie but a goldie. This controversial handset is still the device I get most questions about, bar none, so let’s clear up these issues once and for all.There has never been a mobile phone which more embodied the spirit of JtBP because boy-oh-boy are the good points good (in fact revelatory and revolutionary), but as for the bad points – well… Read more

Google Android vs. Mobile Mac OS X

January 4, 2009 by  
Filed under Features & Editorials

.
If the launch last week of the wonderfully impressive INQ1 didn’t make it abundantly clear, there is an intense war now being fought across the mobile phone landscape and it has nothing to do with megapixels, gigabytes or even – despite what mainstream advertising might tell you – touchscreens. In fact, this war has nothing to do with hardware at all because at very long last it appears dopey manufacturers are getting the message that specsmanship is nothing without a solid foundation of software craftsmanship.It’s a simple, yet much ignored notion that if you want a handset to be used to its full potential it must have a GUI intuitive enough to entice consumers to make the learning process seem worthwhile. After all, if you equipped a car with a circular saw blade instead of a steering wheel, no one would learn how to drive.
/e1d51b|cd84_9314-iphone3gipodtouch.jpg
The reason for this change is simple and polarising. No, not the Apple iPhone – if that’s what you thought you’ve missed the point. It is mobile Mac OS X, the game changing software platform which turns a nicely designed but also in many ways flawed slab of a handset into such an incredible product. You’ve heard it all before: where both the iPhone and iPhone 3G flourish is in terms of usability for despite a number of spec sheet faux pas both generations are a joy to use, an intuitive quantum leap for the sector which has seen perhaps the best examples of convergence to date and the creation of devices which actually encourage owners to use all their featur… *SNORE*Yep, boring. Grandpa Simpson boring. Mind numbingly, spirit crushingly boring.Why? Well, don’t get me wrong – the industry clearly needed the iPhone to kick it up the backside using boots fitted with steel toecaps and a cattle prod but to be almost two yearson from the original iPhone announcement and still find ourselves eulogising about how wonderful/slick/fun the handset is to use is as much an insult to Apple’s vapid rivals as it is a credit to Cupertino. We’re in the tech industry for Heaven’s Sake! Do you think we enjoy prattling on about this every time the latest example of ill-thought out steroid induced specsmanship from the Far East turns up on our desks? No, it’s dull, dull, dull – until now…
/a8c455|09e4_9314-g1.jpg
You see Microsoft might have ambitious plans for Windows Mobile (6.5 and 7 are both scheduled to launch in 2009), Symbian might evolve beyond all recognition now the newly formed Symbian Foundation is going open source and with the Storm RIM might finally hit back against the iPhone which outstripped total combined BlackBerry sales in recent months.

On the other hand, there’s a quirky little company headquartered in Mountain View, California that has actually gone out there and done it. It’s name is Google – I’m guessing you’ve heard of it – and with the uncanny knack of turning everything it touches into gold, the search giant formed the Open Handset Alliance to create what is currently the most ambitious and exciting alternative to mobile OS X on the market.

Attractive, intuitive, App Store rivalling and – vitally – open source, Android is handset free, network free and yes, free. Praise be, the mobile market suddenly got interesting again.

So with this in mind let’s take a closer look at the two most exciting platforms of the moment and see what there is to choose between them and where their future lies. Ding, Ding – Round One…

This is a sample, read the full editorial at TrustedReviews

Copyright for all reviews, editorials and features on this site belong to their respective publishers. All samples published on this website are via prior agreement with those publishers and serve to act as a portfolio and centralised location for all my work. Contact me at gordon@gordonkelly.com should you wish to commission me or supply review samples, press releases or arrange meetings. 

 © 2009-2017 GordonKelly.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright